XOXNO Lending
XOXNO runs overcollateralized lending on MultiversX and Stellar. MultiversX has not passed Ketju chain-level review and Stellar carries an active rejected verdict, so every venue on offer sits outside the approved settlement set.
- MultiversX receives a favorable versioned Ketju control assessment, or the Stellar verdict changes
- XOXNO launches a material, independently verifiable lending deployment on an approved chain
Watched nightly: a warning on its venues or files, or a cited document that changes, reopens the memo. The first confirmation is due 2026-12-15.
The research file
Mechanism applicability
XOXNO Lending is ordinary overcollateralized pooled lending: suppliers fund a market, borrowers post collateral above the loan value, utilization sets the rate, and liquidation clears unhealthy positions. Nothing about that mechanism is unusual. What decides the record is that both deployments record balances, accrue interest, price collateral and settle withdrawals on chains outside the approved set.
Current observation and perimeter
The DefiLlama protocol API read on 2026-09-15 classified XOXNO Lending as Lending and reported approximately $1.39M across MultiversX, which DefiLlama labels Elrond, and Stellar, listed on 2026-09-02 with no recorded audit. The yield survey the same day observed ten pools, all on the MultiversX perimeter. MultiversX has no Ketju chain assessment at all and Stellar has an active rejected verdict, so both named deployments fail the same requirement.
Control and exit applicability
Validator operation, finality and emergency controls on each chain sit beneath the lending contracts, and neither chain has a favorable versioned assessment a lender could rely on. Utilization limits withdrawable supply in the usual way, and liquidation depends on each chain continuing to price and settle. No audit is recorded for the protocol.
Class rule
The rejected chain class is outside the approved structures, so every protocol in it is not approved until the rule changes. The rule is about the structure, not an adverse finding about this protocol, and it is not a client instruction. The events that would reopen it are listed with the memo.
Sources
The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.
- XOXNO · primary · accessed 2026-09-15
Supports: protocol identity, overcollateralized lending, Stellar deployment - DefiLlama — XOXNO Lending record · secondary · accessed 2026-09-15
Supports: current TVL, Elrond and Stellar perimeter, Lending category, listing date, no recorded audit
Inherited controls
The research above describes the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The layer with the most administrative power sets the position’s effective control; that describes control, not quality or suitability.
| Chain | Verdict | Control | Control constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stellar | Rejected | Issuer can freeze | freeze is native at every level: issuers hold revocation and clawback flags on their assets, and since Protocol 26 the validator quorum can vote to freeze specific accounts and trustlines on-chain (CAP-77). |