KETJU Research

← The Register

Liquidity pool

Maverick V2

Not approved Liquidity pools are outside the approved structures
Issued
2026-08-16
Last confirmed
2026-08-16
Next check due
2026-11-16
Chains
Ethereum · No freeze key, Base · Mixed control, Arbitrum One · Mixed control, BNB Smart Chain · Issuer can freeze

Maverick V2 is a bin-based AMM whose static and automatically moving liquidity modes let providers choose where inventory trades. The design can improve capital efficiency, but official documentation expressly identifies impermanent or permanent loss and the risk of being converted into the underperforming asset. The 2026-08-16 survey measured about $0.99M across six chains. We reject the underlying market-making inventory under the version-1 AMM-LP dossier; routing and position engineering do not change the exposure.

The research file

Mechanism applicability

Liquidity providers supply token inventory into price bins and receive swap fees when their bins are active. Mode Static leaves chosen bins fixed; Modes Left, Right and Both move liquidity under contract rules as price changes. Maverick states that Mode Both can buy high and sell low and that directional modes can leave an LP entirely in the underperforming asset.

Control and exit applicability

The LP chooses the pair, fee tier, bin width, mode and distribution, while pool contracts execute swaps and movement. The factory can set and collect protocol fees, but the pool has no owner. Exit requires the position-NFT holder to remove selected bins; merged bins may first require migration up the merge stack, and the assets returned are the bin inventory then held rather than a guaranteed principal mix.

Current observation and perimeter

The DefiLlama API read on 2026-08-16 classified Maverick V2 as a DEX and reported approximately $0.99M: $0.41M Ethereum, $0.30M Base, $0.14M Arbitrum, $0.12M zkSync Era, $0.01M Binance and $0.01M Scroll. This corrects the stale Ethereum-only perimeter and covers measured V2 pool liquidity rather than MAV staking or governance.

Why the class rule decides

Client value remains token inventory sold against traders and exposed to relative-price movement, so the version-1 AMM-LP rejection controls before scale. Reopen only for a separately measured Maverick product whose return does not require AMM inventory or adverse-asset conversion, then review its own authority, loss and exit mechanics.

Class rule

The amm lp class is outside the approved structures, so every protocol in it is not approved until the rule changes. The rule is about the structure, not an adverse finding about this protocol, and it is not a client instruction. The events that would reopen it are listed with the memo.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

Inherited controls

The research above describes the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The layer with the most administrative power sets the position’s effective control; that describes control, not quality or suitability.

ChainVerdictControlControl constraint
EthereumApproved No freeze key No sequencer, no upgrade key, no operator who can be compelled. Rule changes require social consensus.
BaseApproved with limits Mixed control Coinbase, one regulated US company, operates the only sequencer, and admin keys can upgrade bridge contracts within ~7 days.
Arbitrum OneApproved with limits Mixed control a single sequencer orders >99% of transactions and admin keys can upgrade bridge contracts on a ~7-day timelock.
BNB Smart ChainRejected Issuer can freeze the validator set concentrates around one company, and the chain has been halted by decision.
The memo is public. Monitoring connects the research to positions clients actually hold and flags evidence changes for advisor review. $49 per advisor per month, first 14 days free. Start the trial.