KETJU Research

← The Register

Liquidity pool

Kai Finance

Not approved Runs only on a chain that failed review
Issued
2026-08-15
Last confirmed
2026-08-15
Next check due
2026-11-15
Chains
Sui · Issuer can freeze

Kai Finance is a leveraged yield platform on Sui. The Sui review completed 2026-08-14 found that holdings on Sui can be frozen by a third of stake through standing validator deny lists, and that assets were moved without the owner’s keys by a Foundation-organized upgrade in May 2025, the Cetus response. Nothing settled on Sui is reachable for advised client money, whatever the venue’s quality, so the chain rejects the file. TVL stood near $2.1M at the 2026-08-14 survey.

The research file

Mechanism applicability

Kai Finance is a Sui-native leveraged-yield system. Single Asset Vault depositors fund Leveraged LP Vault borrowers and receive yTokens; active farmers borrow into paired LP strategies at leverage advertised up to 11x. Interest and Sui incentives pay passive suppliers while collateral, margin and liquidation rules constrain active positions. These mechanics establish that the surveyed product is settled and administered on Sui.

Current observation and lifecycle

The DefiLlama protocol API read on 2026-08-15 classified Kai Finance as Leveraged Farming and reported approximately $2.15M entirely on Sui. Kai’s current site displays Single Asset and LP vaults, while recently updated documentation lists live assets and withdrawal-buffer rules. The product is active and its sole-chain perimeter still exactly matches the shared v1 rejected-chain dossier.

Control and exit applicability

SAV suppliers can redeem yTokens only through Kai and depend on borrowers returning liquidity. Kai documents a withdrawal buffer of 10% in the current vault page, temporary withdrawal constraints above 90% utilization, and higher rates intended to induce repayment; its FAQ separately illustrates how 100% utilization can block immediate access. Leveraged farmers also face LP slippage and liquidation. None of these product controls cures the rejected Sui settlement authority.

Why the class rule decides

Every observed Kai position and withdrawal settles on Sui, so the shared v1 rejected-chain dossier decides before protocol quality, leverage or liquidity is weighed. Reopen only if the Sui verdict changes or Kai establishes meaningful liquidity on an approved chain. Any reopened review must then apply the leveraged-looping and AMM-LP dossiers to leverage, liquidation, utilization, yToken redemption, audits and incidents, proposed-size unwind and named unleveraged alternatives.

Class rule

The rejected chain class is outside the approved structures, so every protocol in it is not approved until the rule changes. The rule is about the structure, not an adverse finding about this protocol, and it is not a client instruction. The events that would reopen it are listed with the memo.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

Inherited controls

The research above describes the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The layer with the most administrative power sets the position’s effective control; that describes control, not quality or suitability.

ChainVerdictControlControl constraint
SuiRejected Issuer can freeze freeze and seizure are demonstrated: standing validator deny lists began freezing the Cetus exploiter’s ~$162M within about 80 minutes, and a Foundation-organized vote later moved the frozen funds without the owner’s keys.
The memo is public. Monitoring connects the research to positions clients actually hold and flags evidence changes for advisor review. $49 per advisor per month, first 14 days free. Start the trial.