KETJU Research

← The Register

Liquidity pool

Fluxion Network

Not approved Liquidity pools are outside the approved structures
Issued
2026-08-15
Last confirmed
2026-08-15
Next check due
2026-11-15
Chains
Mantle · Issuer can freeze

Fluxion Network is a DEX on Mantle built for trading tokenized real-world assets, pairing v2 and v3 AMM pools with an order book. Its liquidity positions carry impermanent loss: when a pair’s prices diverge, the depositor is left holding more of the weaker asset and less of the stronger one. That loss cannot be explained to a client in two sentences and is indefensible when it bites, so the class rule rejects every AMM pool regardless of protocol quality. TVL stood near $2.6M at the 2026-08-14 survey.

The research file

Mechanism applicability

Fluxion describes itself as Mantle’s live spot DEX, and its published architecture exposes both V2 pool contracts and a V3 factory and position manager. V2 LPs hold fungible pool shares; V3 LPs select concentrated positions represented through the position manager. Both supply inventory for swaps and collect fees as trades change the asset mix, directly meeting the shared v1 amm-lp dossier. A separate RFQ or limit-order path does not change the LP exposure reviewed here.

Current observation and lifecycle

The DefiLlama protocol API read on 2026-08-15 classified Fluxion Network as a DEX and reported approximately $1.98M TVL entirely on Mantle. Fluxion’s current official site advertises live Mantle trading, its documentation says mainnet is live, and current contract/API pages publish V2 and V3 components. This supports an active rather than testnet or archived lifecycle while showing TVL below the prior $2.6M survey.

Control and exit applicability

The LP controls when to remove its own position, but swap flow determines the inventory returned. V3 additionally exposes range and out-of-range risk through its position-manager architecture; V2 exposes full-range paired inventory. Fluxion publishes a security-program repository and Mantle contract addresses, but audits or a bounty do not restore the asset mix sold through adverse price movement or guarantee proposed-size exit in a roughly $1.98M venue.

Why the class rule decides

RWA branding, RFQ execution and lower swap slippage describe trader execution; they do not remove the LP’s market-making obligation or impermanent-loss path in the V2 and V3 pools counted as TVL. The shared v1 amm-lp dossier therefore decides before protocol-specific audit or Mantle review. Reopen only for a distinct Fluxion product whose client return does not require paired or synthetic market-making inventory, with independently verified contracts, cash flows and proposed-size exit.

Class rule

The amm lp class is outside the approved structures, so every protocol in it is not approved until the rule changes. The rule is about the structure, not an adverse finding about this protocol, and it is not a client instruction. The events that would reopen it are listed with the memo.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

Inherited controls

The research above describes the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The layer with the most administrative power sets the position’s effective control; that describes control, not quality or suitability.

ChainVerdictControlControl constraint
MantleRejected Issuer can freeze the team can push instant upgrades; there is no exit window a client could use.
The memo is public. Monitoring connects the research to positions clients actually hold and flags evidence changes for advisor review. $49 per advisor per month, first 14 days free. Start the trial.