AshSwap
AshSwap is the first stable-swap AMM DEX on MultiversX, with auto-concentrated liquidity pools and a veASH farm-boost system. DefiLlama recorded about $0.82M across ten live pools on 2026-08-24, with the largest near $86K. An LP deposit is a pro-rata claim on pool inventory that arbitrage shifts toward the weaker asset. Most of the advertised return comes from ASH emission, not trading fees. This is an AMM-class decision, not a rejection based on individual research. The advised sleeve cannot avoid inventory rebalancing and impermanent-loss exposure, so the class rule decides. The protocol is also below the size floor, so we do not open an individual review until it clears that floor. A chain that has not passed review would also reject.
- Ships a product line without impermanent-loss exposure that merits its own review
Watched nightly: a warning on its venues or files, or a cited document that changes, reopens the memo. The first confirmation is due 2026-11-24.
The research file
The mechanism
AshSwap pools use a stable-swap formula for like-priced assets and an auto-concentrated liquidity design. Swap fees range from 0.05% to 0.4% by pool. Depositors receive LP tokens and earn 50% of trading fees. They can stake the LP tokens in farms that emit ASH. The documented Total APR formula adds ASH emission to trailing-24-hour trading APR. Stakers can use governance-staked veASH to boost farm emissions up to 2.5 times. The headline yield therefore depends on the staker’s own governance position, not just on the pool.
Control and operating record
AshDAO governance uses governance staking, farm-weight voting, and bribes. Farm-weight votes decide where ASH emission flows. A project must ask AshSwap to whitelist its token before it can enable a multi-reward farm, so that path needs permission. The docs publish an audit report page. The MultiversX chain itself has not passed chain-level review here. No deployment on that chain is now suitable for a recommendation, whatever the protocol’s quality.
The exit
A depositor withdraws liquidity against the pool’s balances. The fee is zero only at the pool’s ideal ratio, so an imbalanced exit pays a fee. Depth sets the binding limit. The largest surveyed pool holds about $86K, so one advised client position would move the pool as the client tried to exit it.
Why the class rule decides
The amm-lp rule excludes recommendations when the core return requires an investor to keep making a two-sided market and bear inventory rebalancing, at any size. The surveyed $0.82M aggregate and the unreviewed chain would each also reject the product, but the decision does not need either fact. The file reopens only if AshSwap ships a product line without impermanent-loss exposure that warrants its own review.
Class rule
The amm lp class is outside the approved structures, so every protocol in it is not approved until the rule changes. The rule is about the structure, not an adverse finding about this protocol, and it is not a client instruction. The events that would reopen it are listed with the memo.
Sources
The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.
- AshSwap docs — Understand AshSwap · primary · accessed 2026-08-24
Supports: stable-swap AMM DEX on MultiversX, auto-concentrated liquidity, aggregator and perp product lines - AshSwap docs — Liquidity Provision and Liquidity Staking · primary · accessed 2026-08-24
Supports: LPs earn 50% of trading fees, ASH farm emission, veASH boost up to 2.5x, Total APR = token rewards + trading APR, multi-reward whitelist by request - AshSwap docs — Fees · primary · accessed 2026-08-24
Supports: 0.05% to 0.4% swap fees by pool, zero deposit/withdraw fee only at ideal ratio - DefiLlama — AshSwap survey record · secondary · accessed 2026-08-24
Supports: about $0.82M TVL, MultiversX perimeter under the legacy Elrond label, Dexs category, ten live yield pools, largest about $86K
Inherited controls
The research above describes the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The layer with the most administrative power sets the position’s effective control; that describes control, not quality or suitability.
| Chain | Verdict | Control | Control constraint |
|---|